![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Christian Century, August 28, 2008
The book of Job is one of the most beautiful and perplexing books of the Bible. G. K. Chesterton said, "The Iliad is great because all of life is a battle; the Odyssey is great because all of life is a journey; the Book of Job is great because all of life is a riddle." Thomas Carlyle wrote, "A Noble Book; all men's Book! It is our first, oldest statement of the never-ending Problemman's destiny, and God's ways with him here on this earth." John Calvin, while rejecting Job's challenge to God, preached 159 sermons on the book in a single year.
Yet there has been sweeping disagreement over what the book says. Virtually every verse in the bookincluding some of the most decisive oneshas been subjected to scholarly debate. Some exegetes conclude that whole sections, including the prologue and epilogue, are add-ons by scribes eager to temper Job's brusque vilification of God. Others see the so-called Wisdom section (chapter 28) as totally unrelated to the original text. A majority of interpreters view the lengthy intervention by Elihu as an annoying addendum. In recent years scholars like Carol Newsom, Norman Habel, Edwin Good and Robert Gordisto mention only a tiny fractionhave made splendid contributions to unraveling Job's mysteries. Given this volume of scholarship, it might be asked whether there's anything more to say about Job. Samuel Balentine, professor of Old Testament at Union Theological Seminary in Richmond, Virginia, crafts powerful and imaginative understandings of some of the most centraland controversialmatters of the book's theology. Walter Brueggemann, author of The Theology of the Old Testament, calls Balentine's achievement breathtaking: "There is not a page of this commentary on which I was not led, in generative ways, to where I had not previously been." Among the most salient points is Balentine's forthright analysis of the stunning revelation by God (Job 2:3) that he entered the capricious wager with Satan "for no reason." God's often overlooked (or intentionally ignored) revelation is compounded by his remark to Satan in the same verse that he put Job, who is "blameless and without sin," through hell because "you incited me against him." Balentine is clearly deeply distressed at this passage, and his thorough analysis of it (he refers to it 74 times) contrasts markedly with most commentators' failure even to mention the passage. Balentine concedes the inescapable conclusion: even though Job's three friends argue passionately throughout on God's behalf for the traditional doctrine of retributive justice, the entire book is a repudiation of that doctrine. It describes God's seemingly unjust and capricious treatment of the sinless Job, of whom God says early on, "There is no one like him on earth" (1:8). Balentine is sensitive to the fact that even though the ways of God are incomprehensible to humans, the doctrinal thunderbolt "for no reason" raises enormous obstacles for Christians. God's horrific, undeserved treatment of Jobwho of course knows nothing of the wagerraises fundamental questions about the nature of God. God's affliction of Job leaves humankind "to wonder if God can be trusted." Humankindand that is who Job representsis "left more vexed than satisfied." And then the ultimate question: "Even if Job has passed God's test for fidelity, we must wonder if God has not failed Job's test for what is required for God." Balentine offers no rationale for God's action. The book of Job, he writes, "asks us to think about possibilities that conventional expectations may long since have discarded." Balentine's candid analysis of the character of God continues in his extensive treatment of fear as a factor in the human relationship to God. Balentine cites multiple entries on Job's love of God, but just as many on fear. "'Fearing God' and 'turning from evil' are the virtues that define Job's prologue piety (1:1, 8; 2:3)." Phrases not unlike those used by the angel in describing Abraham in Genesis (22:12) occur repeatedly throughout the book, especially in the focus on God's awesome power (9:5-7), which Job perceives to be "destructive and brutal....He senses that God's power is motivated by Anger." Job divulges that even before his affliction, during the golden years of his prosperity, he feared disaster. His affliction: "Every terror that haunted me has caught up with me, and all that I feared has come upon me" (3:25). Balentine writes, "It looks like one who lives in persistent 'fear' and 'dread' (v. 25) as S. Michell has put it, like one 'whose nightmares have come to life.' In the end, it looks like one whose life is defined completely by negatives and absences: there is unease, no 'quiet,' no 'rest.' There is only turmoil (v. 26). The only place where this terror will cease, as Job has already discerned, is in Sheoland even the hope for Sheol is vain." Balentine also examines Satan's charge that Job loves God only because God has provided well for him. "Has not Job good reason to be God-fearing?" Satan asks sarcastically, "Have you not hedged him round on every side with your protection, him and his family and all his possessions?" (1:9-10b). This extraordinarily provocative question goes unanswered (except that in the epilogue Job is indeed recompensed "twice as much as he had before" for his loyaltywhich would seem to confirm Satan's charge). Balentine's commentary is further distinguished by his efforts to take seriously the speeches of Job's three "friends," and especially the interloper, Elihu. He's aware that the friends are widely dismissed as parroting doctrinal generalities. Although he concedes that Elihu is almost certainly an add-on ("a measure of comic relief, [who] offers an easing of tensions that may be compared to the roles of the alazon or buffoon in classical Greek comedy"), Balentine makes a determined effort to probe his arguments. After all, he points out, the angry young Elihu speaks more uninterrupted lines (159) in the book than anybody else except God. Elihu (whose speeches were discovered in the caves at Qumran) not only presents himself as a critic of the three friends, but he has the effrontery to offer his views as if they came from God himself. Overlooking the bombast, Balentine, while acknowledging that Elihu's discourse "increases, rather than diminishes," the tensions of the book, still finds merit in Elihu's explanation of Job's suffering: the real answer to suffering is human pride. "God uses dreams and visions to warn people like Job against the disposition to be proud. If they do not understand the first message, then God will try to get their attention by a second, and decidedly more painful, means of communication." Traditionally the great Jewish sin was for a person to try to subvert the gap between God and humankind. Elihu is angry with Job "not because he has cried out in his suffering, but because he has cried out against God." In Elihu's world, challenging God is unthinkable. Balentine emphasizes that Job doesn't listen to Elihu. Still, Balentine senses in Elihu more than mere anger at Job. He bases this on a conviction of the universality of sufferingthat "with so much suffering in this world, it is little wonder that most, if not all persons, feel themselves to be only spectators." He suggests that for all his bluster, Elihu recognizes that his own well-being "is informed and defined by collective values that have a direct bearing on how every individual lives." In a word, Elihu is far from being as self-confident as his nonstop barrage of Job suggests. Balentine quotes with strong approval Martha Nussbaum: "Blame is a valuable antidote to helplessness." Balentine again goes his singular way by finding in God's two "whirlwind" speeches a much more upbeat interpretation than do most scholars, who generally deprecate the speeches as a denial of humankind's right to question God. Surely God's "gird thy loins" is hardly an invitation for a friendly conversation. Balentine sees in God's theophany speeches an effort to reach out and embrace Job. Job is not challenging God, but only asking for justice and an understanding of suffering. Balentine argues that the speeches show that God "takes extraordinary measures" to discuss with Job "the intricate details of creation's day-to-day rhythms." Balentine finds in God's insistence that Job speak up evidence that God's design of the world "requires more than one voice. What God has to say is not complete until Job adds his words." God is encouraging Job to speak up. "If we have sympathy for Job, we will be looking for signs that his quest for comfort and consolation is important to God." Balentine takes every opportunity to search out textual nuances which suggest that God is actually patting Job on the back. In rebuttal, it might be pointed out that Elihu was motivated by anger and showed no concern for Job's state. A verse of paramount importance to Joband equally so for Christian doctrineis 42:6: "Therefore I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes" (NRSV). Balentine notes that there are no fewer than five translations that "deserve consideration as legitimate possibilities." In reality, there are dozens more, including:
Abhor "myself" or abhor "my words"there is a significant difference. And "I will be quiet" suggests there is no recanting. Under the circumstances, how can any claim be made regarding what "truth" Job speaks, except that "dust and ashes" describes the mortal condition? "Textual ambiguities also make it clear...that whatever Job's last words may mean, they convey anything but a simple confession of sin," Balentine writes. He agrees, however, that Job's experience leads him to conclude that he has been consigned to live in a world where he cries out to a cruel God who doesn't answer. After the whirlwind, Balentine argues, "God's disclosure invites a transformation in Job's understanding about what it means to be 'dust and ashes.'" Balentine concludes with a defense of Joband God: "The lesson for Job seems to be that those who dare to stand before their maker with exceptional strength, proud prerogatives, and fierce trust come as near to realizing God's primordial design for life in this world as it is humanly possible to do." Balentine gives special attention to creation imagerythe cosmic setting against which Job's entire ordeal with suffering takes place. Creation images are common throughout the Hebrew Bible, and Balentine underscores the "role of creation imagery in Job's situation." "Presumably God's objective is to say something that connects with Job's own covenantal instincts, something that enlarges, modifies, and/or corrects his understanding of how to respond rightly to misfortune." Here, however, Job faces a contradiction between the friends' argument that a covenantal relationship is "defined by humility and passive acceptance of the misfortunes God may use to discipline him," and God's approbation of Job for his other covenantal virtues, "including strong words and fierce resistance." What's clear to God certainly isn't clear to Job. Thrust into the malevolent hands of Satan, Job begins, with good reason, to doubt the ways of God. Almost immediately (chapter 3) Job's sanguine relationship with God disintegrates. "Job begins to address God as the enemy who wages an unjust war against him." He believes God wants to destroy him, and he begins to talk back. For 38-odd chapters Job describes to God, in terms bordering on (and perhaps entering) the realm of blasphemy, the realities of human existence on earth. "In the prologue, it is Job who is on trial. Now Job reverses the charges. When God assaults the innocent without reason, it is divine justice, not human fidelity, which must be put on trial," writes Balentine. Job demands justice from God. Humankind's problem is how to bring charges "against an adversary who will not be bound by reason or logic." Even though he realizes that he risks death, Job is prepared to take an oatha profound step in the Hebraic context. "Between Job and his friends it is easy to side with Job," writes Balentine, but "between God and Job where should we take our stand?" "When it comes to 'suffering for no reason,'" the book of Job "seems intent on reminding us that questions about the world, human existence, and God necessarily remain open." To some extent this is a book about wisdom: "But where shall wisdom be found?" Job asks. "And where is the place of understanding?" (28:12). But the wisdom is that "mortals do not know....God knows" (28:12, 23). "Whenever someone proposes to explain suffering by saying it is simple as one, two, three," says Balentine, "the only thing the numbers will likely add up to is a zero. Statements about a truth falsely conceived can claim at most to be only half-truths." Balentine's Job comes with an array of superb prints and engravings and a wealth of stimulating references to literature, drama and music on an accompanying CD. It is a classic against which other commentaries will be measured for a long time. Copyright 2008. Christian Century. Reproduced by permission from the August 26, 2008 issue of the Christian Century. Subscriptions: $49/year from P.O. Box 378, Mt. Morris, IL 61054. 1-800-208-4097. International Review of Biblical Studies, Vol. 53:2006/07, Paderborn, Germany For this commentary, meant primarily for the pastor and lay person, a special and hitherto unprecedented format has been devised: a lucid text, beautifully laid out, interspersed withor rather spiced byinserted sidebars, digressions, illustrations accompanied by commentariesand all this in addition to scholarly note, bibliographical references, indexes, and the like. The series editors want the format to be "as close to multimedia in print as possible" (p. xiii), and they have certainly succeeded. The scholar must be warned, however: there is no translation, nor are there technical notes on the Hebrew text. As an exegetical work, this book is certainly Balentine's opus magnum, though the specialist will occasionally regret the absence of more technical discussions, such as on the date of the book of Job (apparently, a postexilic date is favoured by the author). For Balentine's earlier contributions to the study of Job, see IRBS 47:633; 50:738, 746. The book is accompanied by a Compact Disk that offers supplementary material. One can only wish that the series continues, and that other publishers adopt the same or a similar format. Old Testament Abstracts, 2007 Broadly researched and eminently engaging, this book is an interactive treasure box. It contains commentary, theological reflection, artistic interpretations, prose and poetry related to Job’s struggles, as well as both modern and ancient reflections on suffering, theodicy and the human condition. Balentine reveals the book of Job’s deep ambiguity, beauty and haunting contemporaneity. This volume, like the others in the Smyth & Helwys Bible Commentary series, uses a multimedia format incorporating commentary, linguistic interpretation, works of art, maps, drawings, and quotations from various authors (e.g., Shakespeare, Goethe, G. K. Chesterton, Emily Dickinson) relating to themes found in the Book of Job. The CD-ROM, which contains the entire contents of this hefty but very readable volume and related materials as well, has a powerful search engine for doing lightning-fast searchesa bonus that will enable both the general reader as well as scholar to exploit the rich resources B. makes available. After the Introduction, B. gives a sprightly and cogent theological reading of Job in 30 chapters on the various parts of the book, with suggestions for further reading. He follows the consensus that dates “the final composition between the seventh and fifth centuries BCE” (p. 13). The use of brown ink in the commentary alerts the reader to relevant material in the CD-ROM and to the numerous sidebars (also in brown ink) that provide language-based explanations, contextual or cultural details, and classic or contemporary interpretationsall of which serve to illuminate the text of Job. Following a brief Bibliography, there are four indexes: authors, Scriptures (including the deuterocanonical books), sidebars, and topics. A.A.D. The Bible Today, November/December 2007 This book is more than a commentary on the text of Job. It is an extensive resource in its own right. Besides a highly detailed yet very readable analysis of the biblical text, each page contains intertextual references and explanations, references to literary classics that might throw light on the passage under discussion (for example, Maimonides, Alexander Pope, Anne Sexton), as well as insights from some of the most prominent contemporary interpreters. Unfamiliar Hebrew words are explained in sidebars or endnotes. The literary structure of various passages is provided. Line drawings, photographs, and reproductions of works of fine art illustrate aspects of the passage under consideration. Every page includes one or several learning aids. Finally, the book comes with a CD-ROM that provides additional research tools. This is an exceptional volume in an invaluable series. Of the making of commentaries there seems to be no end, and one often wonders if the reduplication of effort on the part of so many senior scholars is the best use of intellectual capital. But there can be no questions that Samuel Balentine’s commentary on Job represents a major contribution, not only to studies of the book of Job but also to the project of renovating the biblical commentary as a locus for intellectually serious hermeneutical work. The Smyth and Helwys Bible Commentary Series sets out an ambitious agenda for its authors, asking them to engage not only the standard range of historical-critical methods but also aspects of the history of interpretation, including the theological tradition, literature, visual arts, and popular culture. Above all, the emphasis is hermeneutical. While such a comprehensive agenda is commendable as a general goal, the book of Job lends itself exceptionally well to this approach, and in Balentine the project finds an interpreter brilliantly equal to the daunting task. By and large, Balentine situates his reading of Job within the range of interpretive options that are representative of contemporary Joban scholarship. One will not find here radical challenges or strikingly novel frameworks for interpreting the book. And indeed, that is not really the task of commentary writing. In this volume, however, are many new and creative exegetical insights and juxtapositions with other biblical texts. Balentine takes a moderate approach to the issue of the history of the composition of the book of Job (e.g., the prose tale as probably the oldest part, the Elihu speeches in chs. 23-37 and perhaps the wisdom poem in ch.28 as later additions, the third cycle as a difficult but intelligible part of the original design of the book). As he notes, although each addition to the book may have been intended to address perceived difficulties, each nevertheless ends up increasing the tensions. Balentine lets exegetical judgment guide him in his decisions about how to read these sections within the book as a whole. He lets Elihu remain as an “intruder,” a later addition to the book, though he grants him a full and thoughtful interpretation. But the rest of the book he reads as a tensive but intelligible whole, however it may have historically come to be. Thus he decides to interpret ch.28 as Job’s words (though clearly describing other interpretive options). While I am still not persuaded by this interpretive option, Balentine makes the strongest case yet for what these words mean for understanding Job as a character and for the developing issues of the book if they are spoken by Job himself. Similarly, Balentine opts not to treat the transition from the poetry to the concluding prose at 42:7-9 as a sharp fracture line in the book, but rather “as the conclusions to the whole story” (p.708). Balentine rejects the notion that the prose tale represents simply a return to the status quo ante and instead sees it as reflecting and effecting several transformations. Thus it serves as a genuine conclusion, signaling a resolution of key issues. Yet if these characters return to inhabit the world of the prose tale, none of themincluding Godis quite the same as he was in chs. 1-2. Balentine’s interpretation of the conclusion is mediated through his understanding of what occurs in the divine speeches and Job’s response to them in 42:1-6. What happens there is the culmination of an issue that Balentine sees as having run like a red thread through the dialogues: an examination of the nature and meaning of human existence. Indeed it is one of the signal strengths of Balentine’s commentary that he shows how deeply dialogical the book really is. Although many perceive the friends, Job, and God to be talking past one another, Balentine carefully demonstrates that certain core issues are repeatedly addressed from a variety of different perspectives. Moreover, he gives each one its due, exploring what needs to be taken seriously, even in positions that may have little appeal for the contemporary reader. The dialogue about the status roles and responsibilities of humans in the cosmos emerges as the most central of these extended conversations. Thus Balentine sees the animals in the divine speeches as oblique but provocative moral exemplars and God’s harsh address to Job in 40:6-14 as “challenging Job to live still more boldly into the role that God has specially created for human beings…to participate in the governance of the world with the pride and courage that derives from being charged with responsibilities that are only a little lower than God’s” (p.682), a legitimately “proud” role that finds its surprising analogue in Job’s fellow creature Behemoth and Leviathan. Thus Job’s final, syntactically ambiguous words in 42:6 are his acknowledgment of his transformed understanding of humanity (i.e., “dust and ashes”). If Job is thus transformed, Balentine suggests (though he does not develop the idea in full) that God, too, is transformed through the encounter with Job, subtly acknowledging through the double restoration of Job’s possessions that humans have a right to call God to account for injustice and responding to a prayer that Job prays not only for his friends but also for God (pp. 715-17; see also p. 573). Balentine’s reading of Job is immensely powerful, and this brief summary of some of its major points does not adequately convey the exegetical richness of his interpretation. Yet there is something that gives me pause. The book emerges from Balentine’s reading as disconcertingly “useful.” Although he acknowledges the sublimity of the divine speeches, the emphasis seems to be on the speeches as providing lessons for Job to learn about himself. God encourages Job’s participation in their mutual task of just governance. But does this interpretation blunt the edge of a wilder, more terrifying encounterone that may not be as amenable to theological ethics? Does it fall prey to the temptation to “put Leviathan on a leash”? This is the same critique, in fact, that I would make of my own earlier (pre-2003) work on Job. The tension between addressing the legitimate needs of an interpretive community and being able to bring to that community something more disturbing than perhaps even the interpreter wishes to hear is one of the most difficult aspects of Joban interpretation. I suspect that Balentine and I simply disagree about the exegesis of the text, but the meta-issue is important in its own right. Thus far, I have been discussing Balentine’s commentary as though it were an ordinary commentarybut it is far more than that. One of the features that distinguishes the Smyth and Helwys commentaries is the use of extensive artwork and of sidebars. The sidebars may provide additional critical information (e.g. analyses of the structure, ancient Near Eastern context, discussion of textual problems) or the complementary or divergent views of other scholars, but Balentine often uses them to include poetry and excerpts from novels and literary essays that bear on the issue in question. Sometimes Balentine comments on the excerpts. At other times he simply lets them speak for themselves. It is as though Job were visited not just by three friends named in the text, but by a whole host of more congenial friends he never knew he hadfriends like Emily Dickinson, Shakespeare, John Updike, Robert Frost, Mark Twain, and Langston Hughes. Balentine gestures the reader toward further conversations with these poets and writers, drawing Job squarely into dialogue with a wide swath of the western literary tradition, often in unexpected ways. While the sidebars enormously enrich the commentary, they do remain, as their physical location indicates, somewhat marginal to the work of the commentary itself (some are not even in the book but only on the accompanying CD). The sections entitled “Connections,” however, are more central, and here one recognizes fully the extraordinary accomplishment of Balentine’s commentary. In too many commentaries, hermeneutical engagement is thin, slapdash, theologically trite, and not much related to the preceding exegesis. Balentine’s hermeneutical work deftly teases out the deep issues of the text and draws out the implications of what the biblical text is talking about for related explorations in philosophy, ethics, theology, popular culture, and life itself. How refreshing to see a biblical scholar engage Martha Nussbaum on the moral significance of the emotions, Elaine Scarry an beauty and justice, or George Steiner on the perils of reading Kafka, and on and on. Yet for all the intellectual breadth and seriousness of these discussions, they are eminently accessible and deeply evocative for the pastoral tasks of preaching, teaching, and pastoral care. Balentine’s commentary stands as a model for what commentary writing could and should be. Even more, what he has accomplished has profound implications for what theological education should be doing to equip the interpreters of Scripture. Carol A. Newsom |