Paul is the New Testament’s most prolific writer and church evangelist. He wrote to inspire, teach, rebuke, and defend the gospel and his ministry. He wrote to churches and to individuals, and the totality of his work defined the role of apologist for Jesus Christ. Paul also provided much of the foundation for the formal study of theology. Over the years he has been equally lauded and condemned for his teachings on everything from the human sin condition to salvation by grace. The criticisms have been most intense on his views of women in the church and the lessened value of the Hebrew Law. A close study of Paul’s teachings prove many of the criticisms to be hollow, even petty. However, that has not altered his polarizing impact on the church over time. Possibly Paul’s greatest contributions have centered on the gospel being provided to the Gentiles and the creation of the church in the first century. Without Paul’s intensity and myopic devotion to the progression of the gospel message, today’s church might have developed differently.

Paul’s letters to Timothy and to Titus are commonly referred to as the Pastoral Epistles and make up three of the four personal writings of Paul (the other being to Philemon). These letters are considered “pastoral” due to the nature of the writing and the specific roles being assigned to Timothy and Titus. Paul had mentored both men to varying degrees and had asked them to undertake difficult and challenging pastoral assignments. Timothy was given leadership of the internally troubled church in Ephesus that was suffering due to an influx of false teachers. Titus was sent to the island of Crete to reach the rough-and-tumble inhabitants known for their treachery and deceit. It is clear from Scripture that both men were young, lacked pastoral experience, and needed structured guidance and encouragement. Paul clearly addresses these needs in the pastoral letters, which demonstrates the value of teachings directed to individuals rather than the corporate church.

A consistent reality of Paul’s ministry was his view of the imminent return of Christ and, thus, the end of this age. Above all others, this particular view frames his instructions both to pastoral leaders and to the church. Paul felt an urgency to equip the church for a ministry of reaching the Greco-Roman world for Christ. To this end, he wanted the church to be led by genuinely godly people who would ensure that all teaching was sound and uncompromised. This is clearly the case in the Pastoral Epistles, as his repetitive themes center on false teaching and the role of the church leader(s). In essence, these letters are primers on how to live lives of faith and how to deal with pernicious issues within the church. Despite the fact that the letters were written to specific groups in the first century, they hold universal value to modern church leaders as well.

In today’s church, the arrival of a new minister is often a time of celebration and hope for the future. The newly installed spiritual leader is honored and enjoys the luxuries of a “honeymoon” period. Some churches even continue to provide what is known affectionately as an “old-fashioned pounding” for the new ministry family. This practice dates well back and has a long history of providing for the basic start-up needs of the new minister. Unfortunately, this practice does not stretch back as far as Timothy’s time serving the church in Ephesus. The “pounding” he received in Ephesus was most certainly not of the loving and equipping kind.

The Ephesus church was going through a difficult period and was virtually teeming with theological and relational problems and issues. Internal and external problems and issues literally tore at the foundations of the Ephesian fellowship. The problems common to these Christians focused on false teaching and bad theological practices, infusions of ancient practices, church order, and the roles of men and women in the church. During this divisive period, Paul assigned Timothy to lead the dysfunctional and struggling church, granting him authority and command over the entire fellowship of new believers. Paul obviously knew that it was imperative for someone to take charge and rid the church of sinister (even if only misguided) elements and provide proper theological structure.

Timothy’s first and foremost challenge was to deal with the rash of false teachings that were negatively impacting the church fellowship. False teaching was neither new nor unique to Ephesus. Jesus warned of false teachers, as did most of the other New Testament teachers and writers. Paul dealt strongly with such issues in both the Galatian and Corinthian letters, coining a term denoting the contrary nature of the false theology. This “different gospel” was a desertion of the overall gospel of Christ and also promoted a “different Jesus” and a “different spirit” (2 Cor 11:1). Paul uses a Greek verb in 1 Timothy 1:3 to show that these teachers had indeed deviated form the norm of New Testament teaching. Multiple times in the letters to Timothy and Titus, Paul cites “the faith,” “the truth,” “sound doctrine,” “the teaching,” and “the good deposit,” contrasting Paul’s view of the gospel message with the newly minted versions.

Paul clearly drew the battle lines and provided Timothy with almost unprecedented pastoral authority to deal with the crippling problems of the Ephesus church. In the process of assigning blame and selecting Timothy, he neglected to offer specifics as to the identity and actual message of the deviant teachers. Itinerant teachers and philosophers were common during that era in Greco-Roman cities, and most offered unique perspectives, questions, and views. In reality, it was most likely unnecessary to be overly specific with either Timothy or other sympathetic church leaders. They knew the problem people and the degrees of false theology being proffered. Plus, Paul had a tendency to focus on the particular church to which he was writing and did not seem to have a genuine future view of the church. Paul labored under the assumption of the imminent return of Christ and thus would not have envisioned the church of one hundred years hence, and certainly not the passage of two millennia.

Order this book from
our online bookstore

Home | Books | Curriculum | Freebies | Contact Us